<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for foucist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foucist.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foucist.com</link>
	<description>&#34;Performance&#34; Marketer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:28:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on phear by bamm</title>
		<link>http://www.foucist.com/marketing/phear/comment-page-1/#comment-1895</link>
		<dc:creator>bamm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foucist.com/marketing/phear/#comment-1895</guid>
		<description>k-rad post mang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>k-rad post mang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Godaddy versus Namecheap by Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.foucist.com/marketing/godaddy-versus-namecheap/comment-page-1/#comment-1799</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 14:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foucist.com/marketing/godaddy-versus-namecheap/#comment-1799</guid>
		<description>Actually, GoDaddy sucks balls. Have fun when they hold your domain for $200 ransom just because Joe-Blow says you spammed him with no proof. Oh and they&#039;ll also give out your &quot;private&quot; whois info to whoever and charge you $50 to forward any requests sent to that whois. Ya... GoDaddy is REAL good...

Plus, if you have to &quot;google&quot; how to use an interface, something is seriously fucked up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, GoDaddy sucks balls. Have fun when they hold your domain for $200 ransom just because Joe-Blow says you spammed him with no proof. Oh and they&#8217;ll also give out your &#8220;private&#8221; whois info to whoever and charge you $50 to forward any requests sent to that whois. Ya&#8230; GoDaddy is REAL good&#8230;</p>
<p>Plus, if you have to &#8220;google&#8221; how to use an interface, something is seriously fucked up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The DO NOT READ Affiliate Blog list by Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.foucist.com/marketing/the-do-not-read-affiliate-blog-list/comment-page-1/#comment-1793</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 06:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foucist.com/marketing/the-do-not-read-affiliate-blog-list/#comment-1793</guid>
		<description>You forgot one...

foucist.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot one&#8230;</p>
<p>foucist.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to hijack traffic from the idiot that ripped your LP and left your p202 code on the page by Ghost</title>
		<link>http://www.foucist.com/marketing/how-to-hijack-traffic-from-the-idiot-that-ripped-your-lp-and-left-your-p202-code-on-the-page/comment-page-1/#comment-1594</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foucist.com/?p=45#comment-1594</guid>
		<description>One tip here.

Use the below syntax instead.  Reason:  if you use if document.URL as above- if they&#039;re using any extra parameters in the url it will not work.  IE - someone tracking a ton of different ads/banners/etc and who has http://www.domainwhostoleyourshit.com?trkid=10b  (/10c/20a/40f/etc) in my quick test this wouldn&#039;t work.  So switch to if.DOMAIN and just hijack all potential fun from this one domain.

Thanks for posting where prosper handles this

var badDomain = &quot;domainwhostoleyourshit.com&quot;;
if (document.domain == badDomain)
{
window.location = &quot;http://www.urlyouwanttoredirectto.com&quot;;
}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One tip here.</p>
<p>Use the below syntax instead.  Reason:  if you use if document.URL as above- if they&#8217;re using any extra parameters in the url it will not work.  IE &#8211; someone tracking a ton of different ads/banners/etc and who has <a href="http://www.domainwhostoleyourshit.com?trkid=10b" rel="nofollow">http://www.domainwhostoleyourshit.com?trkid=10b</a>  (/10c/20a/40f/etc) in my quick test this wouldn&#8217;t work.  So switch to if.DOMAIN and just hijack all potential fun from this one domain.</p>
<p>Thanks for posting where prosper handles this</p>
<p>var badDomain = &#8220;domainwhostoleyourshit.com&#8221;;<br />
if (document.domain == badDomain)<br />
{<br />
window.location = &#8220;http://www.urlyouwanttoredirectto.com&#8221;;<br />
}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on phear by Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.foucist.com/marketing/phear/comment-page-1/#comment-1559</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foucist.com/marketing/phear/#comment-1559</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s *fear... phreak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s *fear&#8230; phreak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Godaddy versus Namecheap by Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.foucist.com/marketing/godaddy-versus-namecheap/comment-page-1/#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foucist.com/marketing/godaddy-versus-namecheap/#comment-1476</guid>
		<description>The reason I don&#039;t use godaddy is their long history of being very easy to get a domain removed. I&#039;ve talked to more than a few guys who lost their domains after the first C&amp;D notice to Godaddy for a site. Namecheap also has privacy at a much lower rate (free for first year, then $3 thereafter).

As one of the above people mentioned, the $200 ransom is quite real, and has been used by some marketers to get the little guys out of the game. Also from what I hear , it was recently increased to $500.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason I don&#8217;t use godaddy is their long history of being very easy to get a domain removed. I&#8217;ve talked to more than a few guys who lost their domains after the first C&amp;D notice to Godaddy for a site. Namecheap also has privacy at a much lower rate (free for first year, then $3 thereafter).</p>
<p>As one of the above people mentioned, the $200 ransom is quite real, and has been used by some marketers to get the little guys out of the game. Also from what I hear , it was recently increased to $500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Godaddy versus Namecheap by foucist</title>
		<link>http://www.foucist.com/marketing/godaddy-versus-namecheap/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>foucist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foucist.com/marketing/godaddy-versus-namecheap/#comment-872</guid>
		<description>Last time I tried namecheap, absolutely none of the coupons worked on the renewals.  But I&#039;ll check that next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time I tried namecheap, absolutely none of the coupons worked on the renewals.  But I&#8217;ll check that next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Godaddy versus Namecheap by Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.foucist.com/marketing/godaddy-versus-namecheap/comment-page-1/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foucist.com/marketing/godaddy-versus-namecheap/#comment-869</guid>
		<description>Name.com is cheaper than both &amp; has free privacy (and coupons work on the renewals.)

&amp; I think the interface is pretty easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Name.com is cheaper than both &amp; has free privacy (and coupons work on the renewals.)</p>
<p>&amp; I think the interface is pretty easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The DO NOT READ Affiliate Blog list by PPCpimps</title>
		<link>http://www.foucist.com/marketing/the-do-not-read-affiliate-blog-list/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>PPCpimps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foucist.com/marketing/the-do-not-read-affiliate-blog-list/#comment-863</guid>
		<description>I think you may have hit the ole nail on the head here.  Can&#039;t wait to be added to the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you may have hit the ole nail on the head here.  Can&#8217;t wait to be added to the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The DO NOT READ Affiliate Blog list by foucist</title>
		<link>http://www.foucist.com/marketing/the-do-not-read-affiliate-blog-list/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>foucist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foucist.com/marketing/the-do-not-read-affiliate-blog-list/#comment-862</guid>
		<description>Hater!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hater!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.203 seconds -->
